Saturday, October 23, 2010

Blog #4


                                         The Fearsomeness of Brando's Kurtz
In the 1979 film Apocalypse Now, the story of Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness novella was revised and retold from a different view. Many concepts between the film and the novella were similar, for example the character’s names, their role in the story, and the location of where the story took place. Although there were multiple smaller similarities, like the few previously described, there was one that was captured perfectly in the film. The similarity was the fearsomeness of Marlon Brando’s character, Colonel Kurtz.
            One concept from the film that made Brando’s Kurtz so frightening was his physical features. Brando was a heavier set, tall, man who was very good with his facial features. He pulled off looking angry all of the time, which over time made the viewers understand the importance of his character, knowing that he was something more than insane. It was obvious that he had all the power just by watching the way the other characters looked at him and followed him, even though they all knew he was deathly ill. In the scene where the viewers first meet Kurtz, it is plausible to assume that Kurtz is going to be a big, dangerous, and crazy man, which I believe was performed well in the film.
            Another concept that made Brando’s Kurtz so frightening, and possibly the most important concept, was the lighting involved in the film. The lighting was used in a unique way. It was used to accentuate the different sides of Kurtz. The light would hit half of his face so that the other half would be completely dark, giving the viewers a literal black and white concept. The usage of this kind of lighting was so important because it made the viewers really think of the fact if Kurtz was actually insane or not.
            Overall the film was very interesting and I thought that it was a well-done revision of Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. The cast was perfect and the main points from the novella, like the darkness of the jungle and the loss of morality was portrayed very well. The physical features of Brando’s Kurtz and the way the lighting was used, were two very significant ways of showing how frightening Kurtz really was. The film gave me a different perspective of the novella, and actually helped me understand it a little bit better due to the fact that Conrad’s Heart of Darkness was a very difficult novella to read and comprehend.
           
           

           
           

Monday, October 11, 2010

Portfolio Essay #2

                                              Achebe’s Views on Conrad’s Heart of Darkness
            Chinua Achebe’s essay “An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness,” was originally delivered as a chancellor’s lecture at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, on February 18, 1975. After the speech was delivered, it was soon published under the title “An Image in Africa” in the Massachusetts Review.
 Achebe wrote about the western desire, and its need to set up Africa as a foil to Europe. What Achebe means by this is that everything bad about Africa was shown so Europe could be highlighted.
“Quite simply it is the desire-one might indeed say the need- In western psychology to set Africa up as a foil to Europe, as a place of negations at once remote and vaguely familiar, in comparison with which Europe’s own state of spiritual grace will be manifest.” (337)
Achebe also wrote about the dehumanization of Africa and Africans in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. Achebe suggests that the dehumanization that occurs decreases the goodness of the book.
“The real question is the dehumanization of Africa and Africans which this age-long attitude has fostered and continues to foster in the world. And the question is whether a novel which celebrates this dehumanization, which depersonalizes a portion of the human race, can be called a great work of art. My answer is” No, it cannot.” (344)
            Although Achebe’s essay made strong, straight-forward points, had biographical facts of racism, and positive tone pathos; it also showed issues with fairness, focus and a biased outlook.
Achebe was able to create an essay that was not only well written, but easy and interesting to
read. He was able to do this because of several important features inserted in his essay. Each of these features range from a variety of concepts, but piece the essay together.
One of these features is the fact that Achebe used strong and straight-forward phrases to get his point across. There was not much interpretation involved when he used these phrases, and it also made the essay more interesting. An example of one of Achebe’s straight-forward phrases was when he stated what the ultimate questions were.
“The real question is the dehumanization of Africa and Africans which this age-long attitude has fostered and continues to foster in the world.” (344)
Another feature that strengthens the essay, are the uses of biographical facts of racism. Achebe suggests that it is not Conrad’s fault that he is racist because he was born in 1857, a time when Africans were not thought highly of. He suggests that he may not be at fault, but his later attitude towards Africans is unacceptable. Achebe’s use of biographical racism is both compelling and damaging to Conrad.
“It was certainly not his (Conrad’s) fault that he lived at a time when the reputation of the black man was at a particularly low level.” (344)
            Another strong feature was that Achebe showed emotion throughout his essay. The tone pathos helped the reader really relate to what he was trying to say. He used certain punctuation, like explanation points. The explanation points let us know how he was feeling when he wrote the essay. It almost seems like Achebe was either angry or very frustrated while writing this essay, because of tone pathos.
“Surely the only native language possible in London is Cockney English. But our writer means something else-something appropriate to the sounds Indians and Africans make!” (349)
      Although Achebe had strong points in his essay, he also had some weaknesses. One of his weaker points argues the fairness of evaluating an earlier culture and its values. Times have changed so much since Conrad wrote The Heart of Darkness. Racism has decreased to a dramatic extent, and slavery has ended with people frowning upon it. So is it fair to accuse someone of being a racist, when that’s the way they were brought up? That is one of Achebe’s ultimate questions.
“His (Conrad’s) obvious racism has, however, not been addressed. And it is high time it was” (344)
      Another weakness in Achebe’s essay is his sense of focus. No counter-arguments were able to be supported because he was so focused on racism. Racism was an obvious issue in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, but it was not the only issue. His focus on racism is Achebe’s biggest weakness in the essay. Achebe’s thoughts on Conrad’s racism were so repetitive throughout the essay, that it was almost impossible to know that the Heart of Darkness is a classic piece of literature.   
“The point of my observations should be quite clear by now, namely that Joseph Conrad was a thoroughgoing racist.” (343)
      The last weakness that was noticed in Achebe’s essay was that he was bias towards the whole subject of racism. Achebe is a native to Africa, which explains why he is so infuriated with Conrad’s racism and his discrimination towards Africa. Most of Achebe’s essay contains evidence that Conrad felt that Africans were sub-human, which is a concept that was probably taken personally by him upon reading Heart of Darkness.
“Africa as a setting and backdrop which eliminates the African as human factor. Africa as a metaphysical battlefield devoid of all recognizable humanity, into which the wandering European enters at his peril.” (344)
Chinua Achebe’s essay was well-written, interesting, and showed significant strengths and weaknesses. Its strengths included the uses of strong, straight-forward points that made the essay more interesting and easier to read. It included biographical facts of racism, which helped the reader understand the main points, like why Africa was being set up as a foil to Europe. It also had a positive tone pathos, which let the reader really feel and relate to what was being said in the story.
 The weaker points included the fairness in evaluating an earlier culture and its values, its focus on only racism, which made supporting counter-examples impossible, and the fact that Achebe is bias because he is African.
 Achebe’s main point of how Africa was used as a foil for Europe was proven
through his thoughts in his essay. It was made clear that Africa was seen as the “other” place, and Europe as the primary. Africans were thought of as sub-human and clearly Achebe was not alright with that concept.
The essay was enjoyable and informative. It took racism in Heart of Darkness to a whole new level, and was able to let the reader relate to Achebe’s thoughts. The essay proposed the perfect arguments against Conrad’s Heart of Darkness.































Works Cited

Achebe, Chinua, “An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. Armstrong,
336-349.


Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Blog Assignment #3 "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"


Brooke Wilcox
Professor Timmons
English 105
October 4, 2010
“Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”

The “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy is a law that was established in 1993. It was created because of the debate over gays in the military. The policy limits the military’s ability to both ask service members of their sexual orientation, and allow gays to refrain from homosexual acts while keeping their sexuality disclosed.
            When President Obama was a candidate for presidency, he vowed to end the policy, but once he was elected, he said it was congress’s role to make the change. The House has voted for repeal, but the full senate has not yet acted.
            Federal Judge Virginia A. Phillips, from California ruled that the “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy was unconstitutional. The law was challenged under the fifth and first amendments to the constitution. According to the plaintiffs, the policy violated the guarantee of due process under the Fifth Amendment, and violated the free-speech rights under the First Amendment, and Judge Phillips agreed.
            The issue of “Don’t ask, don’t tell” is interesting and important because it is so controversial. Saying that gays are not allowed to serve in the military is discriminative, and has hurt thousands of people.
            There have been quite a few significant events related to this issue. Major Margaret Witt served in the Air Force and Air force reserves for 17 years. She tried to keep a low profile, but was discharged in 2007 under the “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. According to the United States Justice Department, “If Major Witt wins and is allowed to serve openly as a lesbian, it will undermine morale in the services by creating two standards of fairness: one for her and another for everyone else.”
            Although the senate republicans voted unanimously to block the bill supporting repeal, President Obama, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, and Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff all said they were in favor for repealing the policy.
            The “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy is a black and white issue. There are many reasons why an individual would take either side. If you are one of the many gays or lesbians in our society, then you would want to be treated the same as everyone else, and be able to show your true self. On the other hand, if you were brought up with strict morals, and a very religious lifestyle, then you would already have an issue with gays, so allowing them to be in the military might make you hesitant.


Works Cited
Dao, James. “Days After ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Ruling, Another Challenge Heads to Court.” Nytimes.com. The New York Times, 12, Sept. 2010. Web. 14 Sept. 2010

Shwartz, John. “Judge Rules That Military Policy Violates Rights of Gays.” Nytimes.com. New York Times, 9 Sept. 2010. Web. 11 Sept. 2010

Steinhauer, Jennifer. “After Ruling on Gay Policy, New Questions For Obama.” Nytimes.com. New York Times, 11 Sept. 2010. Web. 16 Sept. 2010

Shwartz, John. “California: Plaintiffs Propose Ban in Suit Over Policy on Gays.” Nytimes.com. New York Times, 16 Sept. 2010. Web. 20 Sept. 2010.

Herszenhorn, David. “Move to End ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Stalls in Senate.” Nytimes.com. New York Times, 21 Sept. 2010. Web. 2 Oct. 2010